Bertram31.com General Bulletin Board

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey

Posted By: Vic Roy
Date: Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 3:32 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey (Ron Cahoon)

Ron - I apoligize. I got a little frisky on that one, and what I really meant was "many" are whores, certainly not all. My legal profession has gone mostly to shit since I was admitted to the bar in 1969. Lawyer advertising did it to us. When you have 95% of the lawyers chasing 5% of the revenue, things get ugly. To this day, 5% of the lawyers, mostly the good ones, make 95% of the revenue. I served for many years, gratis, on the board that enforced legal ethics, and finally quit in disgust. Instead of a handfull of serial offenders that neglected their clients' business, advertising and chasing a buck resulted in huge numbers of lawyers stealing money from their clients. I lay the blame at the feet of the U.S. Supreme Court which legalized lawyer advertising in a case out of KY years ago. Opened the floodgates to stealing to support the advertising habit.

Anyhow, again please accept my deep regrets for painting with too wide a brush.

UV

Messages In This Thread

Legal recourse to a bad survey
STeveZ -- Monday, 1 May 2006, at 6:26 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Vic Roy -- Monday, 1 May 2006, at 7:01 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Charlie Haws -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 9:21 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ron Cahoon -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 1:22 p.m.

Whores
Sean Burlingham -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 2:57 p.m.

Re: Whores
Ron Cahoon -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 4:12 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey *LINK*
Capt. Dick Dean -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 3:15 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ron Cahoon -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 4:15 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Skipper Dick -- Monday, 1 May 2006, at 7:14 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Walter Kaprielian -- Monday, 1 May 2006, at 7:45 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ryan -- Monday, 1 May 2006, at 11:10 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
phil -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 7:48 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Capt. Dick Dean -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 9:04 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Eddy G -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 9:35 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Capt. Dave Kosh -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 9:43 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Jack -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 1:11 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Walter Kaprielian -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 2:10 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ron Cahoon -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 2:56 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Vic Roy -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 3:32 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ron Cahoon -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 3:44 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Walter Kaprielian -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 4:09 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Carl -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 5:02 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
bruce -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 5:43 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ed C. -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 9:13 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Chiles -- Wednesday, 3 May 2006, at 8:34 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Peter -- Wednesday, 3 May 2006, at 9:43 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ron Cahoon -- Wednesday, 3 May 2006, at 11:36 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Tony Meola -- Wednesday, 3 May 2006, at 8:40 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ed C. -- Thursday, 4 May 2006, at 6:56 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Chiles -- Friday, 5 May 2006, at 11:36 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Bill -- Saturday, 6 May 2006, at 1:44 p.m.