Bertram31.com General Bulletin Board

Whores

Posted By: Sean Burlingham
Date: Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 2:57 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey (Ron Cahoon)

I don't think UV meant to offend anyone in particular but I'm sure he'll speak for for himself.

The truth is the new breed of licensed professionals, the generation of which I'm in, are sadly all at least 90% whores- maybe 99%. Seen in in all the licensed professions he mentioned: doctors, lawyers, architects, engineers, insurance agents, and yes also with brokers, both for boats and for real estate.

It's just the state of affairs now. It's good because it's easy to distinguish yourself to those who are paying attention by NOT being a whore. It's bad because the public mostly thinks we are all whores, because that's what they see, and it damages the professions as a whole. But that's the way it is- go blame MTV or whatever.

Boy is that off topic

Messages In This Thread

Legal recourse to a bad survey
STeveZ -- Monday, 1 May 2006, at 6:26 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Vic Roy -- Monday, 1 May 2006, at 7:01 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Charlie Haws -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 9:21 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ron Cahoon -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 1:22 p.m.

Whores
Sean Burlingham -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 2:57 p.m.

Re: Whores
Ron Cahoon -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 4:12 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey *LINK*
Capt. Dick Dean -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 3:15 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ron Cahoon -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 4:15 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Skipper Dick -- Monday, 1 May 2006, at 7:14 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Walter Kaprielian -- Monday, 1 May 2006, at 7:45 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ryan -- Monday, 1 May 2006, at 11:10 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
phil -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 7:48 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Capt. Dick Dean -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 9:04 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Eddy G -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 9:35 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Capt. Dave Kosh -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 9:43 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Jack -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 1:11 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Walter Kaprielian -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 2:10 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ron Cahoon -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 2:56 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Vic Roy -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 3:32 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ron Cahoon -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 3:44 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Walter Kaprielian -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 4:09 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Carl -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 5:02 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
bruce -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 5:43 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ed C. -- Tuesday, 2 May 2006, at 9:13 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Chiles -- Wednesday, 3 May 2006, at 8:34 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Peter -- Wednesday, 3 May 2006, at 9:43 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ron Cahoon -- Wednesday, 3 May 2006, at 11:36 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Tony Meola -- Wednesday, 3 May 2006, at 8:40 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Ed C. -- Thursday, 4 May 2006, at 6:56 p.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Chiles -- Friday, 5 May 2006, at 11:36 a.m.

Re: Legal recourse to a bad survey
Bill -- Saturday, 6 May 2006, at 1:44 p.m.