Bertram31.com General Bulletin Board

Re: E10, not E85

Posted By: Rawleigh
Date: Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 12:34 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay (Harv)

Isn't what we are really talking about E10, not E85? E85 requires vehicle conversion or Flex Fuel vehicles. You may see it as an option at the pump, but not all gas will be E85. E10 in all gas is the enemy that we need to fight. Having an E85 option for Flex Fuel is fine. The real question is how does E10 affect Aluminum and other type of tanks. The post that talked about tanks and aluminum fittings was about E85. I don't think that we should confuse matters by talking to reps about the wrong things. We need to be accurate to have people take us seriously and not think we are Chicken Little. Rawleigh

Messages In This Thread

Ethanol--Here to Stay
Harv -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 6:38 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Bill G -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 7:29 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Bob McCarthy -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 8:56 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Dug -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:26 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Tony Meola -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 9:45 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
John B -- Wednesday, 22 February 2006, at 10:22 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Paul Haggett -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:46 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
CArl -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 7:54 a.m.

SS Tanks are GOOD *LINK*
zerocavity -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:00 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
DAVIDR -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:15 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Charlie Haws -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:56 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
jim wolfe -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:02 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
craig mac -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:27 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Walter Kaprielian -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:17 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
randall -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:30 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Harv -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 11:54 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Capt. Dave Kosh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 12:29 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Rawleigh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 12:34 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Bill G -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 2:17 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Charlie Haws -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:19 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Tony Meola -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 10:34 p.m.

Re: E10, not E85
Charlie Haws -- Friday, 24 February 2006, at 10:07 a.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Peter -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 2:51 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
lobsta1 -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 3:56 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Rawleigh -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 5:16 p.m.

Re: Phone call tomorrow
Harv -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 6:36 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
bob fioresi -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 8:29 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
Kevin Mehegan -- Thursday, 23 February 2006, at 9:06 p.m.

Re: Ethanol--Here to Stay
CArl -- Friday, 24 February 2006, at 8:41 a.m.