Bertram31.com General Bulletin Board

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH

Posted By: Capt. Dave Kosh
Date: Wednesday, 8 February 2006, at 4:56 p.m.

In Response To: Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH *LINK* (zerocavity)

Excellant information Gerry. I wish that was available when I put mine down. It is certainly true about the sacrifices of performance . Mine are small but calculatable. For instance, my fuel burn was 1.27 KMPG . Now it's 1.19 KMPG. No noticable difference in performance otherwise.So for what you gain one must also consider what you loose.

All in all I can run to the Tortugas now and have done it. I can run to Christmas Ridge now and will. I can also run to Pulley Ridge if I want. Man women think we're wacko. Tight lines and good post . Many folks will thank -you as well. Dave K

Messages In This Thread

Yanmar 315 - GPH
Kevin -- Tuesday, 7 February 2006, at 10:29 p.m.

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH
Harv -- Tuesday, 7 February 2006, at 10:33 p.m.

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH
mike ohlstein -- Tuesday, 7 February 2006, at 11:19 p.m.

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH
Chris Holgerson -- Wednesday, 8 February 2006, at 8:20 a.m.

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH
Capt. Dave Kosh -- Wednesday, 8 February 2006, at 10:21 a.m.

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH *LINK*
zerocavity -- Wednesday, 8 February 2006, at 10:56 a.m.

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH
Capt. Dave Kosh -- Wednesday, 8 February 2006, at 4:56 p.m.

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH
Kevin Saer -- Wednesday, 8 February 2006, at 7:13 p.m.

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH
JIMMYG. -- Wednesday, 8 February 2006, at 5:30 p.m.

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH
Harv -- Wednesday, 8 February 2006, at 5:37 p.m.

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH
JIMMYG. -- Thursday, 9 February 2006, at 12:38 p.m.

Re: Yanmar 315 - GPH
Stan -- Thursday, 16 February 2006, at 7:53 p.m.